Search for: "Seal 3 v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am by Anubha Sinha
Elsevier filed a review petition to overturn the sealing order. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
They attempted their coup without going to court first to assert their claims; they simply began using the names and the diocesan seal, both in their communications to clergy in South Carolina, and on the Web. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Therefore, we’re updating our last list of Parisian transcripts to include additional Parisian transcripts that are publicly available (we do not knowingly list transcripts that have been filed under seal ? [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am by Rosalind English
The fourth appellant, Halligen (“H”), is a British citizen whose extradition is sought to the USA under Part 2 of the Extradition Act 2003 (the “Act”) to face allegations of wire fraud and money laundering. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
But there was no Swiss company “Crown Cork & Seal CO” registered at the address indicated in the notice of appeal, which was the correct address of the “Crown Cork AG” company. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
These pressures and issues have been at the forefront of the patent community since the American Inventors Protection Act was enacted on November 29, 1999[2] and amended by the Intellectual Property and High Technology Technical Amendments Act of 2002, and they have pitted different elements of the patent community against each other.[3]  Below is an overview of the more notable portions of the America Invents Act that relate to improving patent quality and third party participation,… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:52 pm by Wanda
Thursday, January 19, 2012 Big win for Roy Black in the 11th Circuit Posted by David Oscar Markus The case is USA v. [read post]