Search for: "Sealed Third-Party Defendant" Results 61 - 80 of 715
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
There is no obvious harm that would rise to the level to justify sealing: there is no allegation of wrongdoing by the suretors and there is nothing improper about posting bond for a defendant. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
The post Court Rejects Defendant's Request to Seal 9-Year-Old Libel Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court also rejected Travis's request to seal court records: [P]laintiff claims that failure to seal court records has a high probability of causing harm to a third party, who had previously "gone through stalking, harassment, and sexual trafficking. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
This struck me as likely unconstitutional, because of its substantive scope, because it was entered as an ex parte TRO with no opportunity for the defendants to be heard, and because it purports to restrict the free speech rights of third parties who also had no opportunity to be heard. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Courts in this Circuit, faced with a request by a party to proceed anonymously or pseudonymously, balance that party's privacy concerns against "both the public interest in disclosure and any prejudice to the defendant" …. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
And there are other cases where proceedings are held "under seal" for specific reasons. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by SHG
” This strikes me as likely unconstitutional, because of its substantive scope, because it was entered as an ex parte TRO with no opportunity for the defendants to be heard, and because it purports to restrict the free speech rights of third parties who also had no opportunity to be heard. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" This strikes me as likely unconstitutional, because of its substantive scope, because it was entered as an ex parte TRO with no opportunity for the defendants to be heard, and because it purports to restrict the free speech rights of third parties who also had no opportunity to be heard. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Dominic Solari
Circuit and was rejected by the Third and Ninth Circuits “when applied to records or third-party testimony. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:25 am by Emma Snell
The race is the most transparent and the most closely contested since democracy returned to Nigeria in 1999, with a third-party candidate running neck-and-neck in the polls with the candidates from Nigeria’s two main political parties. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
The documents the Defendants seek to seal are central to this litigation and the dispositive motions at issue. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Compounding these challenges, trade secret owners often seek immediate equitable relief to prevent the defendant and third parties from using or disclosing a trade secret before trial. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:38 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
The third way is called a “researcher,” where the model finds relevant cases and statutes, extracts relevant propositions, and crafts a brief based on them. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 10:04 am by Anna Bower
” Accordingly, McBurney instructs the parties to talk about whether the report is the “equivalent” of a general presentment. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:40 am by David W.S. Lieberman
DermaTran was sold to a third-party, the proceeds of that sale were also turned over to the government as part of the settlement. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Regarding the third Wiwa factor, the breadth of the documents requested is indisputably voluminous. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Defendants contend that Plaintiff "cannot now claim the need for protection in the third iteration of this suit based on an alleged concern [for] privacy. [read post]