Search for: "Sec v. American Board of Trade"
Results 61 - 80
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
Sec. 2. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
Sec. 2. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:42 am
Tarullo compared the Rules to Dickens’ Jarndyce v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
The SEC took "no view" on corporate requests to exclude access proposals this year after a U.S. appeals court ruled that the agency improperly allowed American International Group (AIG) to omit an access proposal by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
A particularly significant case was SEC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am
Title I: Emerging Growth Companies Title I of the legislation is the Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act, which is designed to promote job creation and further economic growth by making it easier for more companies to access capital markets by reducing the cost of going public for small and medium size companies. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
I am a member of the Board of Directors of each of these organizations. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
TweetOn September 13, 2011, the Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued an opinion in Menendez v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm
Tweet Image via Wikipedia On September 13, 2011, the Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued an opinion in Menendez v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
And the SEC has a proposal out that seeks to address these concerns. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
The National Business Aviation Association, an industry trade group, is on the defensive. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
American corporations will enter a realm equivalent to the American presidential politics of “permanent campaign,” except more problematically so, because the corporations also will have to fund a substantial aspect of their competitor nominees’ election costs. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
SEC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
The solution: We bid zero on the SEC contract; and, needless to say, we were low bidder. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
Recently, the Supreme Court acting in its legislative capacity voted on January 21, 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
