Search for: "Sell v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 6,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It held: On the [Ninth Circuit’s] view, the “use of a mark may be ‘noncommercial’ even if used to sell a product. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
The United States appears poised to heed that call with the small fraction of Russian frozen assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
" This shift followed the substantial and unprecedented government intervention in civic and economic life accompanying the United States' entry into World War I. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:07 pm by Jason Kelley
United States, ruling 5-4 that the Fourth Amendment protects cell phone location information. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
United States Taylor Swift is threatening legal action against the Florida college student who tracks the private jets of celebrities and public figures, including Swift. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]