Search for: "Sellers v. District of Columbia" Results 61 - 80 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 9:46 am by Sarah M Donnelly
District Court for the District of Columbia approved a modification to the Keepseagle settlement agreement, which included a process for the distribution of funds to cy pres beneficiaries. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm by David Kopel
 Inter alia, he created the “narrow individual right” theory of the Second Amendment, which was later popularized by historian Saul Cornell and earned four votes in the Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Of the remaining twenty-two states plus the District of Columbia with a sales tax, significant state actions would be required before remote seller sales tax collection could proceed without it being an excessive burden on interstate commerce. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
  But in an amicus brief supporting the Government, 22 States and the District of Columbia—including 10 States with a Federal Exchange—pointed out that accepted principles of federalism prevent Congress from imposing such a condition without clearly putting the States on notice. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act: Like the old California regime, the CPPA enables private individuals to act as “private attorney[s] general” in enforcing consumer protection laws. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:51 am by Amy Howe
” In 2008, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Grayson found standing when a plaintiff who’d purchased prepaid calling cards alleged that sellers of those cards improperly kept unspent balances as profits instead of turning those amounts over to the District of Columbia as unclaimed property. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm by Tyler S St Cyr
District of Columbia 524 F.Supp.2d 35,40  (D.D.C.,2007). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
[Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner] Opinion below (Supreme Court of Washington) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia, et al. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 8:40 am by Ellen T. Berge and Shahin O. Rothermel
The District of Columbia requires that sellers that offer a free trial of one month or more obtain the consumer’s affirmative consent to continue with the paid subscription, before charging the consumer. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]