Search for: "Sellers v. State of Georgia"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2017, 3:12 am
The court stated that the loss of funds only occurred when the cardholder used the card to pay for a transaction and the issuing bank paid the seller for the transaction. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
Digital Ally, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 12:54 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 12:54 pm
Barnes v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Regular in-state purchases insufficient.Rawlins v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Dobson and Gott intended to defend the government's allegations, in part, by claiming that Keith Smartt, a mortgage broker, had told them that a gifter need not be a family member.One of the disclosed documents, an email from Gott to his counsel, stated that Gott had called several mortgage companies to ask whether they had any programs that allowed the seller to contribute the down payment and all of them said no. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
The sellers moved to compel arbitration; the trial court denied the motion.Discussion Standard of Review The arbitration agreement states that the Federal Arbitration Act governs its enforcement. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
The sellers moved to compel arbitration; the trial court denied the motion.Discussion Standard of Review The arbitration agreement states that the Federal Arbitration Act governs its enforcement. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
The hospital then filed what is known as an interpleader action in Georgia state court. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Many states have legislation on the books that insulates non-manufacturing intermediate sellers from strict liability. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Unlike Lucy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:31 am
In Georgia, for example, the state's dram shop law specifically states an impaired driver can't collect damages from the person or entity that furnished the drinks. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
PEARSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:19 am
Dion v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
“Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:40 am
Dass) and Rutgers (V. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
-based internet ticket seller, Sachs was injured in a train accident in Austria. [read post]
