Search for: "Sellers v. Wilson" Results 61 - 80 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 8:12 am by David Whitehead
Summary The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal in PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC & Anor v O.W. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am by Dave
We have dealt with the basic facts in Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd [2014] UKSC 52 when considering its previous incarnations (Cooke v Mortgage Business [2012] EWCA Civ 17 and Re North East Property Buyers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2991 (Ch)). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Vipul Kapoor, Olswang LLP
Swindling buyers and crooked agents aside, it should not be forgotten that another culprit in this unfortunate sequence of events are the solicitors who act for the sellers. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xxxvi] This makes Bitcoin risky and unpredictable for both buyers and sellers. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Withdrawing a December 2013 order, the Ninth Circuit replaced it with an opinion reversing a federal district court’s dismissal of claims brought under the Alien Tort Statute and remanded the case for further proceedings (Doe v Nestle, September 4, 2014, Wilson, S). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:05 am by Broc Romanek
In this article, the authors, practicing attorneys Mattia V. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm by Bill Stalter
  But, SB883 steps on the toes of large preneed sellers and preneed insurance carriers. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:27 am by Ron Coleman
If you’re so inclined, you can begin your reading with Lee v A.R.T. [read post]