Search for: "Serafin v. Serafin"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
On 5 March 2021, HHJ Parkes QC heard the Pre-Trial review in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz & ors . [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
On 26 July 2019 the UK Supreme Court granted the defendant in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz permission to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal allowing the claimant’s appeal against the dismissal of the claim by Jay J (see our post here). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
Recent Judgments and Orders The order of the Court of Appeal in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz is now available [pdf]. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
On 3 April 2020 Warby J gave a judgment (at a remote hearing via Zoom) in the case of Zenith Logistics v Coury [2020] EWHC 774 (QB). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the operation of the section 4 defence in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:43 am
In Serafin, Lord Wilson giving judgment for the Supreme Court, held that any ‘reference to a checklist is now inappropriate’, before reverting the case back to trial for a more flexible approach, sensitive to the particular facts of the case [75]. [read post]
