Search for: "Shank v. Shank"
Results 61 - 80
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2020, 2:58 am
The “Black Book”, as it is widely known, is a comprehensive commentary to the Patents Act and the last edition not only provides updates but also includes substantial revisions of key parts that have been affected by the recent case-law, such as Eli Lily v Actavis, Generics (UK) v Warner-Lambert, Actavis v ICOS and Shanks v Unilever. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Earlrose Golf and Leisure Ltd & Anor v Fair Acre Investments Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1295 (03 December 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ralphs, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2555 (03 December 2009) Bevens, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2554 (03 December 2009) Hussain v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 2556 (03 December 2009) Gian & Anor v Crown Prosecution Service [2009] EWCA Crim 2553 (03 December 2009) High Court (Chancery Division)… [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:43 am
This appeal was a rare inventor’s compensation case. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 2:00 am
USPLS, P.C. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Then see if you agree with me as regards the following maxim:When you're clearly guilty of murder, put on no evidence at the guilt phase, and have prior convictions for both the forcible rape of a 9-year old girl as well as a home invasion robbery, don't repeatedly make (and get caught with) shanks and jail-made handcuff keys in your cell while you're awaiting trial. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:58 am
WHAT: Hearing in Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 10:35 pm
Shanks, No. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:37 am
With respect to the allegations of professional malpractice, although the defendants [*2]made a prima facie showing that they did not deviate from good and accepted standards of physical therapy practice, through the submission of deposition testimony, medical records, and the affidavit of a licensed physical therapist (see Shank v Mehling, 84 AD3d 776, 777-778 [2011]), the affidavit of a licensed physical therapist submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition was sufficient to… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:32 am
” Shank v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:30 am
Shank, Washington County Republican, sayMr. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
Kapoor “shanked” his shot. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 2:13 pm
He then commented on some decisions of lesser importance but still worthy of note (Shanks(inventors' remuneration), Generics v Teva (CGK and multiple experts), Accord(title to priority), Chugai(validity of foreign IP)). [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
The government has filed its reply in support of its July motion for a stay pending appeal in Hatim v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief Constable… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
Back in December 2009, in the Patents Court for England and Wales, Mr Justice Mann gave a ruling in Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:58 am
The lesson to be drawn from Knight [v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:19 pm
Wyers v. [read post]
