Search for: "Shank v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 6 and Thursday 7 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 8:56 am by Larry
On the way, I figured I would OMG, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
The losing competitor was Shanks, a business with vast experience in the field of waste management throughout the UK.But the release of highly confidential documents during the course of 2016/17 following SEVEN separate applications to the Scottish Information Commissioner to overturn refused Freedom of Information requests, shows the project had hit funding and technological problems by January 2012, only nine months after the contract was handed to NESG. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
TUESDAY Paper Session: Comparative History of Legal Cultures (Private Law)Tue, 6/20: 10:00 AM  - 11:45 AM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Sala 455, Danubio Tower (4th Floor) ·         Chair—Andrés Botero Bernal, Industrial University of Santander ·         Discussant—Dong Jiang, Renmin University of China  ·         A Comparison of… [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
When Gerry Goldstein, a celebrated criminal defense lawyer in San Antonio, heard I was moving to Albany, he said I had to meet Terence Kindlon and Laurie Shanks. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:06 am by CJLF Staff
  Ohio Swamped With Overdose Deaths:  Following a narrative that is playing out across the country, the state of Ohio is being overwhelmed with fatal overdoses of heroin and fentanyl. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 9:31 am by Randall Hodgkinson
William Shank, No. 112,982 (Thomas)Sentencing appealPeter MaharryImproper consecutive sentencesUnworkable restitution orderState v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Glossip v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In particular he stated that 'there was no suggestion from either party that the Shanks patents were crucial to Unilever’s success. [read post]