Search for: "Shields v. Shields" Results 61 - 80 of 6,991
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
I have written before about court opinions concluding that rape shield rules cover only other consensual sexual acts by the alleged victims and not other nonconsensual sexual acts by alleged victims. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:20 am by Colin Miller
That was the unique question recently addressed by the Seventh Circuit in its recent opinion in Jardine v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing RulingBack in 2010, I posted an entry about the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm by Melinda L. McLellan and Jenna N. Felz
Perhaps responding to such critiques, European Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality Věra Jourová said, “I urge you not to simply dismiss this mechanism before it has even been put to the test. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:05 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Justice Commissioner Vĕra Jourová and US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, launched the first annual joint review of the E.U. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:05 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Justice Commissioner Vĕra Jourová and US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, launched the first annual joint review of the E.U. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Catherine Muyl
Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker on 23 February 2016 to EU Commissioner Věra Jourová including the “package of EU-US Privacy Shield materials” (of 128 pages) which is... [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am by Josh Wright
  But the DOJ’s recent announcement of case against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan looks like the DOJ’s first major “exclusionary” conduct case — despite the fact that it is brought under Section of the Sherman Act rather than Section 2 (there is also a state antitrust law claim). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the doctrinal front, she addresses civil procedure (i.e., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]