Search for: "Shilling, Appeal of"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
Ms F brought a s.204 appeal, which upheld the Council’s decisions. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
Hard-fought appeal by D. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm
"Yes," held the 9th, in this 18 USC 2422(b) appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:49 am
And, while I’m shilling, it doesn’t get any better than some from Rhett Miller, the lead singer of The Old 97's (isn't Twitter great?) [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am
The Court of Appeal’s little Xmas gift for landlords Well Santa has climbed down the collective landlord chimney early this year hasn’t he? [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
Fortunately, at the moment, it appears that Google users can opt out of becoming unpaid shills (though how long Google will allow that is unclear). [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
There is no appeal. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
There is no appeal. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 9:35 pm
(Other than Google with its advertising-centric business model.)Oracle's appeal brief twice quotes what Oracle Co-President and Chief Financial Officer Safra Catz said in her testimony at last year's Android/Java trial:"It's pretty hard to compete with free." [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:13 am
This was the question posed to the Dallas Court of Appeals in Shilling v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Last week the Dallas Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Shilling v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
” This is what we would expect from organizations on the Google Shill List who, like Pavlov’s dog, will serve up red herrings right on cue at the sound of the bell. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 6:53 am
(See the Google “shill list“.) [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
The judge also puts a period on his "show me your shills" adventure. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:09 pm
But it should not be enough that he is the judge in the case and the litigants have to do what he orders them to do (or spend a great deal of money and good will on an appeal), whether or not there is a proper legal basis for his orders. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
Although it’s not in his interest to create appealable issues, the order almost creates another issue for the parties to bicker about at the appellate level. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
The opinion is (of course) on appeal before the Federal Circuit. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
The case is over, and Judge Alsup casts his order as possibly being useful “on appeal or on any remand. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
For an appellate lawyer, what’s especially interesting is the reason the judge gave for this order: the disclosure required by this order would be of use on appeal or any remand to make clear whether any treatise, article, commentary or analysis on the issues posed by this case are possibly influenced by financial relationships to the parties or counsel. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:54 pm
" The information could "be of use on appeal or on any remand to make clear whether any treatise, article, commentary, or analysis on the issues posed by this case are possibly influenced by financial relationships to the parties or counsel. [read post]
