Search for: "Shirk v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:44 am
When water flows from one portion of a river that is navigable water of the United States, through a concrete channel or other engineered improvement in the river constructed for flood and stormwater control as part of a municipal separate storm sewer system, into a lower portion of the same river, can there be a "discharge" from an "outfall" under the Clean Water Act, notwithstanding this Court's holding in South Florida Water Management… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:29 pm
Ioli Trust v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:11 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:39 am
Judge Silverman wrote an interesting dissent in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
“The Montana Supreme Court has shirked its responsibility to follow that decisions and the United States Supreme Court should reverse their ruling. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Cruise ships generally transport passengers between ports in the United States and foreign countries. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
As a matter of our domestic law, we could take the decision in A v United Kingdom into account but nevertheless prefer our own view. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
District Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
United States, where the high court narrowed the scope of honest services fraud criminal conduct, gutted part of Scanlon’s plea arrangement with prosecutors. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
United States, docket 11-182. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
As the norms of international law change and expand with the times, so to does the law of the United States change with them. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
As the norms of international law change and expand with the times, so to does the law of the United States change with them. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
Aragon was without the legal right to work in the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
United States, 74 Fed. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
United States issued last Thursday, has quickly received a fair amount of buzz in the blogosphere. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:20 pm
United States is getting some discussion in the blogosphere, mostly because of the overwrought dissents. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:19 am
United States, that has a fascinating set of opinions. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:48 pm
United States, 219 Ct. [read post]
