Search for: "Short v. City of Birmingham"
Results 61 - 80
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2012, 4:53 am
Birmingham City Council v Richard Lloyd (2012) CA Civ 23 May 2012 (On Lawtel but not on BAILLI) A short note on this hearing as it is a situation which is likely to become far more common. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:53 am
Birmingham City Council v Richard Lloyd (2012) CA Civ 23 May 2012 (On Lawtel but not on BAILLI) A short note on this hearing as it is a situation which is likely to become far more common. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Birmingham City Council, Trengrove v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
The Independent has a short report here and the Hansard transcript is here. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
As Lord Mance pointed out in Doherty v Birmingham [2009] 1 AC 367, para 126, section 2 of the HRA requires our courts to “take into account” EurCtHR decisions, not necessarily to follow them. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
” Comtel Air passengers on a Tuesday flight to Birmingham, England, from the Indian city of Amritsar were hit up for 130 pounds — about $200 each — during a layover in Vienna. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
All three appellants were appealing review decisions by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
All three appellants were appealing review decisions by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The action then shifted back to the House of Lords, who in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2009] 1 AC 367 (our note is here) reaffirmed the majority approach in Kay, although they crowbarred a bit more into gateway (b). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The action then shifted back to the House of Lords, who in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2009] 1 AC 367 (our note is here) reaffirmed the majority approach in Kay, although they crowbarred a bit more into gateway (b). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural error and would be insufficient to… [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Khazai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) We've been waiting for this one. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Khazai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) We've been waiting for this one. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The ordinary rules of precedent continue to apply and judges continue to be bound by Lambeth LBC v Kay and Doherty v Birmingham CC (Kay v Lambeth LBC at [43]–[44]; [50]; [62]; [121]; [175]; [178]; [213]) unless and until the Supreme Court rules otherwise. [read post]
