Search for: "Short v. Hill"
Results 61 - 80
of 965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Some of the humor is (not-very-funny) Benny-Hill-type slapstick. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., the Fourth Circuit's recent opinion in PETA v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:23 pm
(My article on Cooper v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
See Marchand v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Yet, as Bush v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Antoine v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Panopticon blog has a short introductory article on the UK’s new adequacy decision with Korea, the first of its kind under post-Brexit UK GDPR. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
Want to work in beautiful Chapel Hill? [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, a plaintiff must allege that “‘but for’ the attorney’s conduct [or nonfeasance], the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140-141 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But wisdom was in short supply in Jefferson Davis’s cabinet. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Long-term easy is short-term hard. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
The implications of the change in the law for the occupation of parsonage houses and short-term lets of church property remain to be seen. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
Petitioners apparently never read to the end of the (short) appendix before citing it! [read post]
[Josh Blackman] An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know
7 Nov 2022, 7:24 am
And, on short notice, we added a brief discussion of Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
EMB is currently conducting a short online survey of users of the current website. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Below is my column in the Hill on today’s argument in the two college affirmative action cases in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:23 am
The case is Trump v. [read post]
