Search for: "Short v. Mary et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
“Ghost Work” by Mary Gray—platform organization makes it harder for workers to organize, and that’s part of the point. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Int’l L. 457-550 (2010).Carrico, Amanda R., et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
In short, Ms. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
One of the most remarkable, and objectionable, aspects of the third edition was its failure to engage with Federal Rule of Evidence of 703, and the need for courts to assess the validity of individual studies relied upon. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Time and again, we see firms that have good policies, but fall short on implementation. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
We offer two definitions: a one-sentence definition that applies to all professions, and a more in-depth, but still short, definition for the legal profession. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
"This, in part, might reflect the common culture of law school course pedagogy, in which the utility of a course directed in the short term to the bar and in the middle term to the first job, is an important way that students weigh the value of a course (and therefore the amount of time that ought to be devoted to its mastery." [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Kroger, Attorney General of Oregon, Mary H. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
O’Keefe v Caldwell (1949) Argus Law Reports 381. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
By Michael J. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
& Leila Barraza et al., Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (forthcoming 2023) In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of cr [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Cullen issued his decision Feb. 20, 2003. *** BE&K Construction Co. (32-CA-9479, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 29) Pittsburg, CA Sept. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:56 pm
Airgas, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
