Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Finally, the Court held that the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
Nagpal v. IBM Canada Ltd.: Ontario court emphasizes that resignation must be “clear and unequivocal”
26 Nov 2019, 9:44 pm
In a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court, the court considered whether an employee’s failure to return to work after his disability benefits were denied amounted to a voluntary resignation. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Mullins v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:57 am
My new Cato post applauds the Supreme Court for its 8-1 decision yesterday in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am
Court considers long-term disability claim even though the employee never applied for long-term disability benefits The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently heard a case involving a disability insurance claim, Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am
Court considers long-term disability claim even though the employee never applied for long-term disability benefits The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently heard a case involving a disability insurance claim, Smith v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:16 am
Superior Court of San Bernardino County.1 The Court addressed the question of whether insurance practices that violate the Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA)2 can support an action based on the Unfair Competition Law (UCL).3 The short answer is yes. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:10 pm
Especially for something so short. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:42 pm
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:47 am
In short, while parties in California have long relied upon dicta in the Court of Appeal decision known as Nacht v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm
Superior Court, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2010). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:45 pm
Those of us in the civil arena have similarly almost invariably propounded and/or responded to form interrogatories.We now know -- or at least have a more informed view -- of whether such statements are protected work product, and whether (or when) you have to answer Form Interrogatory 12.3.So take a look.The short answer is that witness statements are often work product -- indeed, often absolute work product -- according to today's unanimous California Supreme Court… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Superior Court case -- November 8, 2011. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:11 am
In Endean v British Columbia, 2016 SCC 42 (available here) the Supreme Court of Canada has held that “In pan-national class action proceedings over which the superior court has subject-matter and personal jurisdiction, a judge of that court has the discretion to hold a hearing outside his or her territory in conjunction with other judges managing related class actions, provided that the judge will not have to resort to the court’s… [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Superior Court (2000) 22 Cal.4th 245, 253, fn. 2; Greyhound Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:26 pm
Superior Court (Civic Partners Stockton, LLC) (2007), Case No. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
The short answer is, "no. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:20 am
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:00 am
Superior Court matter. [read post]
