Search for: "Silks v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 9:00 am
Relying on Al-Skeini v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:47 am
A single judge of the Calcutta High Court held in Gemini Silk Limited v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
The 2014 edition of Chambers & Partners states that "...he has a solid commercial appreciation of what's involved in a case". [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
The Court reaches this conclusion primarily upon reliance on United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 06-2020). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
The Belt and Road Initiative was not announced as such five years ago, but in two separate speeches given by Xi Jinping: the first in Astana in September 2013, announcing China’s willingness to create a Silk Road Economic Belt stretching across land from China to Europe; the second in Jakarta in October 2013, mentioning China’s desire to launch its equivalent at sea, the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 6:02 pm
In the United States, judges have been less attached to such grand garb. [read post]
10 May 2021, 9:29 am
Silk, 331 U.S. 704 (1947) and Rutherford Food Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
For example, a group may consist of doctors admitted to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:30 am
We sat in every session for the criminal trial of Silk Road mastermind Ross Ulbricht and took a similar approach to the API patents saga of Oracle v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:26 am
v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Silk and Jillian S, Ashley, "Understanding CHina's State Secrets Laws," CHina Business Review (2011) ("China’s state secrets laws can also burden Chinese enterprises that seek to expand internationally. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 12:00 pm
In NAACP v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
” One of our leading defamation silks, Dr Matt Collins, has also called for a radical redesign and simplification of the law. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
