Search for: "Singh v Singh" Results 61 - 80 of 1,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
Singh, 22-884Issue: Whether the failure to receive, in a single document, all of the information specified in paragraph (1) of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 23 June 2023 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Dube v Warwick. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 15 June 2023, the Court of Appeal (Singh, Andrews and Warby LJJ) heard the claimant’s appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
The attempt to justify the constitutionality of Section 124-A by relying on the judgement made in Kedar Nath Singh v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
  The Facts The brief facts of the cases are as follows: Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (‘Paul’) Mr Harminder Singh Paul collapsed and died from a heart attack on 26 January 2014 whilst shopping with his daughters (aged 12 and 9). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
However, . . . where Plaintiff alleges that the directors of a Delaware corporation breached their fiduciary duties, the issues pertaining to whether Plaintiff has met the threshold for pleading demand futility will be decided under Delaware substantive law”]; Stephen Blau MD Money Purchase Pension Plan Tr. v Dimon, 2015 NY Slip Op 32909[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015, Singh, J.] [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:03 am by Donald Dinnie
In an April 2023 Financial Services Tribunal decision (T Singh v Marsh) previously discussed here (The FAIS Act and debarment: fit and proper), (The jurisdictional requirements for FAIS debarment) and (FAIS debarment: an honest person with integrity), the Tribunal reminded us that debarment is not aimed at punishing the relevant financial services provider but rather to ensure and maintain the honesty and integrity required from a financial services provider. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:21 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Specifically, Anastasiia focused on the impact of World War I on the history of camembert, a French cheese.Anna Maria Stein discussed relevant considerations for brand owners filing trade mark applications for environmentally friendly or sustainable goods and services.PatentsHenry P Yang reported on the appellate judgment in Intex v Ericsson 2023:DHC:2243-DB issued by the Delhi High Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 12:01 pm by Henry P Yang
This test does not follow the reasoning of Unwired Planet v Huawei [2020] UKSC 37, relied upon in Nokia v Oppo as support ([113]). [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 5:13 am by INFORRM
” The Submission calls for a reform of the access to information system in Canada Decisions this Week IndiaNeetu Singh v. [read post]