Search for: "Slough v. Slough"
Results 61 - 80
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 am
In US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December 2010) The Scout… [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:22 am
No big surprise there, as Snider v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
For example, take Griswold v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
Following the Court of Appeal decision in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 a public authority will not be allowed to rely on a defence of qualified privilege if such reliance is incompatible with the claimant’s right to respect for his private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
She had left her home in Slough because of domestic violence and had family in Birmingham. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
Second, it may be noted that Dr Butt’s case raises questions similar to those considered by the Court of Appeal in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 1774, namely the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 impacts upon defences available to public authorities to negate tortious liability. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
– Mark Thomson Case Law: Cooper v Turrell – the assessment of damages for libel and misuse of private information – Hugh Tomlinson QC Hemming and Haigh: Freedom of Speech and Abuse of Privilege Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” – Max Mosley “Harassment and the Media”: Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann Case Law: “Clift v Slough Borough Council – Qualified Privilege meets Article 8″ – Lorna… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
In particular, in W v Westminster ([2005] EWHC 102 (QB)) and Clift v Slough BC [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) he provided remedies to claimants against public authorities in circumstances where the application of conventional libel principles might have appeared to lead to their refusal. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:48 pm
Supreme Court's rulings in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:08 am
In particular a reference is made to the case of Artworld v Safaryan (which we dealt with here). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
Publications of defamatory allegations by the police have been considered pre-HRA, but last year’s case of Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1484) surveyed the qualified privilege landscape in relation to the duties of public authorities under s6 of the HRA, and claimants’ Article 8 right to reputation. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
In particular, in W v Westminster([2005] EWHC 102 (QB)) and Clift v Slough BC [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) he provided remedies to claimants against public authorities in circumstances where the application of conventional libel principles might have appeared to lead to their refusal. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:28 am
The case of Reckis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
This is the question asked by David Allen Green on the New Statesman, referencing the first line of his poem Slough, which is “Come, friendly bombs, and fall on Slough! [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
Guinness Partnership Limited v England, County Court at Slough, 29 April 2019 Ms E was the assured tenant of Guinness. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
See United Public Workers v. [read post]
