Search for: "Smart v. Jones"
Results 61 - 80
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Gloster v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Gloster v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:04 am
In the midst of all this nonsense, Jones did something smart. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
” Rulings Three rulings have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: 03737-18 Jones v walesonline.co.uk, Clause 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy) and 12 (discrimination), no breach after investigation. 04100-18 The Transparency Project v Mail Online, Clause 1, no breach after investigation. 04786-18 Hobson v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
Rulings 03252-18 Armanazi v The Sunday Times, 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy), 9 (reporting of crime) 03565-18 McGurk v scottishdailystar.co.uk, 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy), 3 (harassment), 4 (intrusion into grief or shock), 6 (children) 04140-18 A Woman v Sunday Mirror, 2 (privacy) and 9 (reporting of crime) 04141-18 A Woman v Mail Online, 2 (privacy) and 9 (reporting of crime) 04737-18 Jones v Epsom Guardian, 1 (accuracy), 4 (intrusion into grief or… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am
Jones (holding that installation of a GPS device on a target's vehicle constituted a search), and Riley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
In a 1979 case called Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
The Socially Aware Blog highlights 5 things about “smart contracts”– contracts which integrate technology and coding into their framework to provide useful outputs. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:26 pm
By Marc J. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” The new HR manager lacked experience heading an HR department, but the owner of the company decided to take a chance because she was a “smart, young lady” and he was willing to send her to training. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” The new HR manager lacked experience heading an HR department, but the owner of the company decided to take a chance because she was a “smart, young lady” and he was willing to send her to training. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:22 pm
Claim for Breach of Privacy A private employer could be sued for breach of the expected privacy of an employee for reading an employee’s private files and email based on the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v Tsige, absent such an agreement and likely, given the words of the Supreme Court in Cole, even where such an agreement is in place. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:22 pm
Claim for Breach of Privacy A private employer could be sued for breach of the expected privacy of an employee for reading an employee’s private files and email based on the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v Tsige, absent such an agreement and likely, given the words of the Supreme Court in Cole, even where such an agreement is in place. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But this approach and indeed traditional approaches presume that a particular person is the author of a work - and it a world of selfie taking monkeys, animal rights and very smart robots ....... do we even know what a 'person' is any more - a conundrum confusingly explored and partially explained in Ex-Machina (pictured). [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
V Although Curaçao has plenty of sun, the sun is not always shining for people starting a business. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
The Times reported that, among other things, its reporter overheard Cobb reporting to Dowd: That the President’s personal legal team was in regular and direct conflict with the White House Counsel’s Office, led by former Jones Day partner Don McGahn, with relations so adversarial that Cobb was concerned that one of the lawyers working for him had been enlisted by McGahn as his “spy”; That in particular Cobb and McGahn pointedly disagreed about how to respond… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For instance, the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:39 pm
Supreme Court has already addressed the issue of GPS tracking devices in Jones v. [read post]
