Search for: "Smith v. Board of Adjustment" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Meanwhile, other intellectual property litigation has generally held steady or, as is the case in the patent arena, slowed down as challenges to patents have increased at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the wake of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act that took effect in 2012 and new restrictions on patentability set forth in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
Neither is the court entitled to dispute the correctness of a particular religious belief, though it may ask whether it is sincerely held (Thomas v Review Board). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. [read post]
Chief Justice Deborah Smith has replied to Rob and says that “we are very cognizant of the issue you have raised in your letter and are actively working towards finding a solution”. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
Although it’s not an IAC case, the SCOTUS also issued Smith v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even in the legis. history, Congress discusses White-Smith v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  (I assume the Chief Justice was getting at something like this when he asked Mooppan whether a government's rules have to be neutral and generally applicable "across the board" in the context of contracting.) [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am by Ben
Even though you can see what came from the box office and what you should be paid, there are always adjustments from past performances paid. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Those nonshareholder constituencies that enter voluntary relationships with the corporation thus can protect themselves by adjusting the contract price to account for negative externalities imposed upon them by the firm. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am by David Greene
But it’s not that the advent and popularity of social media has adjusted our free press priorities. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
Consider drafting and discussing with your board an acceptable proxy access bylaw. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am by John Eastman
As it noted all the way back in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Since then, a few other cases, in which constructive knowledge satisfied the Board. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
As written at the Wikipedia:"On August 3, 2006, the Division I Board of Directors took action regarding the two football subdivisions in Division I (Division I-A and I-AA), the Board approved new labels. [read post]