Search for: "Smith v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993); General Electric Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Lynn, MA; Peter Smith, President) Bain Cor, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held that a group called “Feds for Medical Freedom” could challenge that requirement in federal district court, despite the provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 channeling federal employees’ challenges to adverse personnel actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board, subject to review by the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Low reimbursement rates for home care, waiting lists for family support and other community-based services and Medicaid prior authorizations practices challenge families as they try to access supports and services for their children. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Universal Health Services, 974 P.2d 1158, 1159-60 (Nev. 1999); Packard v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
In that case, No. 96-1405, Smith Industries v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
LANE, Appellees. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Foreign corporations -- Service of process on defendant corporation quashed -- Plaintiff attempted to perform substitute service pursuant to incorrect Florida long arm jurisdiction statute -- Further, plaintiff did not strictly comply with requirements for substituted service against domestic corporation, which requires notification by registered or certified mail to defendant after… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm by Employment Lawyers
  On November 18, 2011, the Agency issued a correction to its Letter of Acceptance in response to Complainant’s November 8, 2011 letter. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Bias response and the First Amendment The highest-profile case is undoubtedly Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]