Search for: "Smith v. Dixon" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Smith Docket: 10-1115 Issue: Did the Ninth Circuit exceed its authority under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
Smith, 10-1115, the state petition in the habeas case out of the Ninth Circuit that has now been relisted eleven times. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
  The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:11 am by Alfred Brophy
He later achieved national fame for representing Homer Plessy in Plessy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Abu-Jamal Docket No. 11-49   Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:55 pm by cdw
This week’s edition is now available: Leading off this edition is the Sixth Circuit’s decision in  Archie Dixon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
This judgment sets the clock back to the days of Dixon of Dock Green. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
Smith, Jr., A.D.P.D.) http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a7021-03.pdf NJ DISCOVERY AND EVIDENCE State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
Smiths Medical, 165 P.3d 433 (Wyo. 2007) (less than two months after Karl (the West Virginia case that was number one on our "ten worst" list yesterday), Wyoming adopts the learned intermediary rule); (13) O'Neill v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0255p.06 2007/07/10 Dixon v. [read post]