Search for: "Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to Mills… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Smith, No. 07-1375 A sentence for possession of a firearm by a felon, arising from a search of defendant's residence while he was serving a sentence as a prisoner in a community residential home, is affirmed where: 1) an individual participating in a community residential program has as much of an expectation of privacy as a prisoner in his jail cell since they are treated as prisoners; 2) defendant was informed that officers had the freedom to enter his home… [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
SMITH AND BRUCE M. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:36 pm
Arrington v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
" U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 23, 2008 Smith v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1062 (6th Cir. 1998), we affirm. 07a0438p.06 Smith, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:37 am
LEXIS 40499 (ND WV, June 1, 2007), a federal prisoner complained about his removal from the Bureau of Prisons kosher meal plan. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:17 pm
The suit by two prisoners challenged denial of a Halal diet, denial of a Muslim sponsor, claims regarding prayer at work, interference with the ability to observe Ramadan, and a prohibition on wearing dreadlocks.In Smith v. [read post]
