Search for: "Smith v. Read" Results 61 - 80 of 4,818
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm by Lawrence Solum
Anna Marie Smith (Cornell University - Department of Government) has posted Reading Thurgood Marshall as a Liberal Democratic Theorist: Race, School Finance, and the Courts (Education, Justice, and Democracy, ed. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:07 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
If I have read the Second Circuit’s absurd Cariou v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
"People like to read about a fight," and litigation is always a fight of some sort. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:13 am by jpfaff
The Smiths appear to be a poor family that was poorly represented, and their case did not even merit oral arguments before the Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:54 am by Lisa Baird
In light of this ruling, Reed Smith will be hosting a webinar on Wednesday, October 14, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:16 am
Reading the judgment does make you realise the media fuss was perhaps overdone: the controversy can only really be about Collins J's [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:42 am by James Romoser
Alito says high court is no such thing (Casey Smith & Jessica Gresko, Associated Press) The Supreme Court is in the building — contentious rulings behind, more major cases ahead (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) Mississippi abortion clinic braces for Supreme Court showdown over Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:17 pm by zshapiro
While all agree that the evidence against Smith was weak, the Supreme Court set the standard for reversal in Jackson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am by SHG
The last time I read something that made me feel quite this flavor of incandescent was a decade ago, in law school — it was Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]