Search for: "Smith v. United State Government and Court System et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
This thinking is based on the assumption that parties which derogated the jurisdiction of state courts do not want to re-litigate their dispute there.9 Any intervention of state authorities in the realm of arbitration is considered to be an intrusion.10 Basically, this system is rooted in a deep distrust of state intervention in arbitration proceedings. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Ltd. et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country --… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
Policy et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century (Stephen A. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
Smith-Wythe Airport Commission, et al. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, et al., 2009 WL 73274 (N.D.Ill. 03/16/09). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
