Search for: "Smith v. White et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
THE E. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Woven Image Pty Limited v Autex Industries Limited (Patentology) Brazil INPI postpones request for GI (IP tango) Modernization of the Copyright Act (IP tango) China US ITC report on China piracy shows billions in losses: Senators demand action (IP Watch) (IP Dragon) China launches International Patent Database (IP Dragon) Whitebook on IP Protection in 2010: Is white the new black? [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
A. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
A. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Smith Corp., 990 A.2d 801 (Pa. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
A rook or a pawn: the White House science advisor in an age ofclimate confusion. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Thanks to Eric White for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corp., Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
WPG, Inc. et al, 3:15-CV-444, 2018 WL 2763453 (S.D. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Cal. 2014) (primary jurisdiction invoked with respect to “evaporated cane juice” labels) (collecting cases) see, e.g., Gitson, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
In 2015, for instance, she spoke at a rally opposing California's new strict school vaccination bill, and was later quoted in the Sacramento Bee (David Siders et al.): When she heard at the vigil that Brown had signed the bill, Kimberly McCauley of Sacramento sat down on the steps and cried. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Walgreens et al (CAFC 2009-1237) precedential Judge DYK penned this opinion, with which Judge Bryson concurred. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
No harm, no foul is a good rule to live by. 233 Ga.App. 498 CHAMBLEY et al. v. [read post]
