Search for: "Smith v. Widener" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am by Russ Bensing
And last week in Harris v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:42 pm by David Lat
He has sued the dean for defamation.Suing your current boss or employer — as opposed to suing after you’re gone, a la Matthew Kluger v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:57 am by James Bickford
” At Forbes’s Full Disclosure blog, Daniel Fisher discusses the three major class-action cases of the Term: Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The net result of Doherty perhaps wasn't so much that the gateway was widened as that it was given a nice a lick of paint and some new hinges that no longer squeaked or banged about in a stiff breeze. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The net result of Doherty perhaps wasn't so much that the gateway was widened as that it was given a nice a lick of paint and some new hinges that no longer squeaked or banged about in a stiff breeze. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  Much later in his career, he revisited this issue in statutory form in Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Family (Widener), Michael C. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Superior Court Judge Edward Torack should have alerted the husband's attorney that he and William Smith's professional relationship had resulted in litigation over the judge's departure from the firm 11 years earlier, and Smith should have alerted the court and opposing counsel that he could not give assurance that his client would not seek the judge's recusal, the Appellate Division held in Chandok v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
At the Court of Appeal, the issue was whether the previous court of appeal judgment in Smith v Evans [2007] EWCA Civ 1318 (actually Smith v Buckland, but continually cited here as Evans) could be considered as still standing after the decisions in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57 (our post on Doherty here). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
The proceedings were transferred to the Administrative Court and stayed pending the appeal in Smith (On Behalf of the Gypsy Council) v Buckland [2007] EWCA Civ 1318. [read post]