Search for: "South Carolina v. Samuels" Results 61 - 80 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
That’s what I did when I picked Tim Scott as Senator of South Carolina. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Lindsay Graham has a message for women living in Massachusetts, New York, California, and other deep blue states: We are coming for you.No one should think that “pro-life” Republicans, including South Carolina’s Republican Senator, really mean all that stuff about letting states make decisions about abortion. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm by Harold O'Grady
The remaining electoral votes were in dispute over voter fraud, mostly in three Southern states with Reconstruction governments: Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
: The Case for Critical Histories as Method in Decolonizing South African Legal EducationLunch 12:30-2:00 (St. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In language strikingly reminiscent of South Carolina’s stance in the nullification crisis of the early 1830s, the viewpoint of the states that attempted to secede during the Civil War, and the Southern Manifesto that defiantly asserted the constitutionality of Jim Crow in the 1950s, SAPA purports to nullify various federal statutes claimed to conflict with a tendentiously extreme version of the Second Amendment. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am by NCC Staff
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am by Amy Howe
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh noted that they would have granted Cannon v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:19 am by Alexis Hoag-Fordjour
South Carolina, the Supreme Court held that capital defendants have a constitutional right to inform the jury that they would not be eligible for parole if the jury returned a life sentence. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Robert Destro
” The Pennsylvania experience and the religious tests imposed by states like Maryland, Delaware, South Carolina and Vermont show that “an establishment of religion” forbidden by the Establishment Clause operates as a political faction. [read post]