Search for: "South v. South" Results 61 - 80 of 17,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2015, 6:49 am by Jacqueline Jones
[JURIST] A group of South Dakota lawmakers on Tuesday presented a resolution [text, PDF] to the US Supreme Court asking it to overturn its abortion rulings in such cases as Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:09 am by traceydennis
Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Information Commissioner [2011] EWHC 44 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 19 “In estimating whether the cost of complying with a request for information would exceed the appropriate limit for the purposes of claiming exemption from the obligation to comply in reliance on section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, a public authority was not permitted by regulation 4 of the Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm by Stephen Page
  Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v B- where delay was used to refuse to return a child to Australia, because he was well settled in South Africa.Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v Ashmore- where delay was again used to refuse to return a child to Australia. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Nkwe Platinum Limited v Genorah Resources (Pty) Ltd and Others, ZAGPPHC case no 30712/2023] [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Steve Chemaly
In February 2024, the Supreme Court of Appeal, in Lindsey v Conteh, considered the enforceability of foreign judgments in South Africa. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
Following up on yesterday's post, Law Profs Weigh In On Supreme Court's Wayfair Decision Clearing The Way For Sales Tax Collections From Out Of State Online Retailers: TaxProf Blog op-ed: South Dakota v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:22 am by sally
Balgobin v South West Regional Health Authority [2012] UKPC 11; [2012] WLR (D) 143 “The entry of a default judgment against one of two defendants to a personal injury claim did not operate as a bar to a subsequent finding of liability against the other defendant when the claimant had not made an unequivocal election to only pursue her claim against one defendant.” WLR Daily, 10th May 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]