Search for: "Sparks v. U.s.*" Results 61 - 80 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
In Thomas v Brown and Tennant [1997] FCA 215, the Federal Court of Australia ultimately found that Mr Thomas was the author of the Artistic Work, and thus the owner of the bundle of rights subsisting in it. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
It was held that the work only needed to “possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity”, and no copyright could be found in a work where “the creative spark is utterly lacking or so trivial as to be virtually non-existent. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
Recent officer-involved shootings and public allegations of police misconduct have sparked legal discussion around accountability for law enforcement. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am by Jon Lewis
On May 29, two contracted Federal Protective Service officers were shot outside the Ronald V. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:03 am by Eric Goldman
This jurisprudence has profoundly impacted the law’s scope and reach — and has sparked intense policy discussions, including recently introduced Congressional bills seeking to reverse one of the cases discussed below (Doe v. [read post]