Search for: "Spears v State of New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm
Stateside, the first three chapters examine how the fundamental US/UK differences in attitude towards freedom of speech came about – principally with the bell tolling for reputational rights in 1964 when the case of New York Times v Sullivan (an index stalwart for practitioners) decided that, where allegations concern official conduct, a public official cannot bring a defamation claim unless able to show ‘actual malice’: the defamation law equivalent of… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the decision state that “Judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited and where the arbitration hearing is conducted pursuant to Education Law §3020-a, judicial review is limited to the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm
See the New York Law Journal’s account of the oral argument here. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:13 am
The judgment may also be bad news for Mind Candy in a wider sense, as many of their characters are based on other famous popstars, such as Broccoli Spears and Dustbin Beaver, parodies of Britney Spears and teen pop sensation, Justin Bieber. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:47 am
Heck, I grew up a Jewish kid from New York, and I don't like guns. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Highlights this week included: District Court S D New York: Cloud lockers protected by ‘safe harbor’ provisions: Capitol Records v MP3Tunes (1709 Blog) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:30 am
David was suspended from the practice of law by the States of New York (3 AD3d 174 [1st Dept. 2004] [suspension of 15 months, citing numerous extenuating circumstances]) and New Jersey (181 NJ 326, 857 A2d 648 [2004] [reciprocal discipline of 15-month suspension], and later reinstatement, 186 NJ 459, 896 A2d 472 [2006]). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Torts---creators' rights---doctrine of moral right. 24 New York University L. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:12 pm
Dow announced the indictment today of two ruling members of the New York-based Lucchese crime family and 32 other members and associates, including alleged current and former top New Jersey capos Ralph V. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am
City of New York, 7 AD3d 577; Nallan v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:02 pm
Second, we must ask whether each argument justifies its conclusion, or whether there is reason to see the argument as a rationalization of some deeper sort of anxiety or aversion ("animus", to use the language of Romer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:35 pm
The jury instructions in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
Four of the press releases are reprinted below. **** Release: 5646-09 For Release: April 9, 2009 New York Court Enters Order Imposing a $240,000 Fine and Other Sanctions against New York State Resident Michael Vitebsky in a Foreign Currency Scam Washington, DC - The U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
Carter v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
City of New York, it addressed what constitutes adequate notice of a sidewalk defect for purposes of what has become commonly known as the 'Pothole Law'; and in Matter of Rivera v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 162 BC: Eleazar Maccabeus was crushed to death at the Battle of Beth-zechariah by a War elephant that he believed to be carrying Seleucid King Antiochus V; charging in to battle, Eleazar rushed underneath the elephant and thrust a spear into its belly, whereupon it fell dead on top of him * 4 BC: Herod the Great suffered from fever, intense rashes, colon pains, foot drop, inflammation of the abdomen, a putrefaction of his genitals that produced worms, convulsions, and… [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
Annulment from The New York Divorce Report. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
State of New York Div. of Hous. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Not later than ten days after receipt of the hearing officer's decision [emphasis supplied], the employee or the employing board may make an application to the New York state supreme court to vacate or modify the decision of the hearing officer pursuant to section seven thousand five hundred eleven of the civil practice law and rules. [read post]
