Search for: "Specter v. Specter"
Results 61 - 80
of 949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 7:10 am
The double trouble produced a mistrial over the defendant’s objection, raising the specter of double jeopardy.* William Shakespeare, Macbeth, act 4, sc. 1.The conclusion: "This case having strutted and fretted its hour upon the appellate stage, we conclude that the curtain should be dropped, at least on this Act of it." [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:36 pm
See Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:51 pm
Naftel Ever since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:48 am
Scientific-Atlanta and Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:04 pm
Supreme Court picked up Burke’s language in a 2001 case called Cook v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:08 am
The case is entitled Torres et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:08 am
Cox v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
” And in Riley v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:39 pm
Arlen Specter this week will introduce the Notice Pleading Restoration Act to overturn Twombly and Iqbal and reinstate Conley v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:07 am
Day v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
Day v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 3:40 pm
Arlen Specter (D-PA) filed legislation Wednesday designed to return the standard to what it was prior to 2007, when the court handed down its Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
Related posts: Killing Industry: The Supreme Court Blows Mayo v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:02 am
Galeski v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:35 am
" Specter has introduced a bill which directs federal courts to interpret the rules as the Supreme Court did in the 1957 decision in Conley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 1:41 am
In an earlier post (here), I discussed legislation that Senator Arlen Specter introduced in July 2009 to legislatively overturn the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
In Levay v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:34 am
" Greatbatch Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 7:09 am
In Davis v. [read post]
