Search for: "Squires v. Squires"
Results 61 - 80
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
Erickson and Washington v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 12:54 pm
In Knall Beverage Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:06 pm
Co. v Pistilli, 16 AD3d 477, 479; Squires v Robert Marini Bldrs., 293 AD2d 808, 810, lv denied 99 NY2d 502). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
I tried to stay away from being quite as heavy on AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
Gunn, individually, Williams Squire & Wren, LLP, James E. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:30 pm
- Cleveland lawyer Steven Delchin of Squire Sanders on the firm's Sixth Circuit Appellate Law Blog New Ninth Circuit Decision Explains Application of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:56 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:38 am
.
People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:20 am
People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:16 am
People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
Katfriend Kaori Minami of Squire Patton Boggs reports.* German Federal Patent Court (partially) invalidates 80% of litigated patentsA study provides an astonishing empirical look at the invalidation rate before the German Federal Patent Court and German Federal Court of Justice. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:00 pm
See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:58 am
Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, 464 F.3d 328, 337 (2d Cir. 2006). [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm
FTC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:53 am
Since defendants did not conclusively refute plaintiff’s allegations, their motion to dismiss was properly denied (see Rite Aid of N.Y., Inc. v Chalfonte Realty Corp., 105 AD3d 470, 470-471 [1st Dept 2013]; Kirby McInerney & Squire, LLP v Hall Charne Burce & Olson, S.C., 15 AD3d 233 [1st Dept 2005]). [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:28 am
In GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:10 am
In CDX Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:32 am
Munir Squires Over the course of the past year, a case about four financial software patents has taken on great significance. [read post]
