Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 6:46 pm
Colette (2019) – An appellate court in California held that a director of a California nonprofit public benefit corporation who had standing to sue the corporation and sue another director for self-dealing did not lose standing after she was removed Turner v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm
District Court for Northern California, U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
Professor Kramer was the dean of Stanford law school at the time, and after the Heller ruling, he told me recently, "I couldn't stand up in front of the class and pretend the students should take the court seriously in terms of legal analysis. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
”[2] – ‘Stable Diffusion Frivolous’ (website created by tech enthusiasts defending AI image generators) On January 13, 2023, three visual artists filed a putative class action suit against three AI companies in the Northern District of California, on behalf of themselves and other artists. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
No one in the TM bar has an interest in cleaning up things like that, but it means nonexperts don’t get much guidance. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We acknowledge that if you only read the first sentence of Section 788, standing alone, Mikhail's reading makes some sense. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
Not only that, but they were fictitious in ways that should have raised red flags, including that they had made-up-sounding generic names such as Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
The sheer complexity of the Court's task would be exacerbated if it agreed with states' insistence that any given provision in their laws is severable, and can stand even if other portions are struck down. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
An objective person would not believe that he or she was free to simply start driving away with Officer Kumlander standing in the roadway. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
You can read about 17200 in California here. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
