Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We acknowledge that if you only read the first sentence of Section 788, standing alone, Mikhail's reading makes some sense. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
Not only that, but they were fictitious in ways that should have raised red flags, including that they had made-up-sounding generic names such as Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
The sheer complexity of the Court's task would be exacerbated if it agreed with states' insistence that any given provision in their laws is severable, and can stand even if other portions are struck down. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
An objective person would not believe that he or she was free to simply start driving away with Officer Kumlander standing in the roadway. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
You can read about 17200 in California here. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:48 pm
In its 1988 opinion in Midler v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Anderson tees up that question for possible resolution by the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
This rule has been subject to considerable discussion by California bar members and experts. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 5:41 pm
(Glass v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
Apple and Epic both filed a motion for a writ of certiorari before the Supreme Court; with the outcome of the Epic Games v Apple saga now hinging on whether the Court would take up the dispute. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
But Judge Susan Graber, joined by Judge Roopali Desai, concurred separately to “encourage the Supreme Court to take up this question. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
The court finds that NetChoice has associational standing and grants the TRO. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]