Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California" Results 61 - 80 of 3,405
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
  We acknowledge that if you only read the first sentence of Section 788, standing alone, Mikhail's reading makes some sense. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am by Bob Ambrogi
 Not only that, but they were fictitious in ways that should have raised red flags, including that they had made-up-sounding generic names such as Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
The sheer complexity of the Court's task would be exacerbated if it agreed with states' insistence that any given provision in their laws is severable, and can stand even if other portions are struck down. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
An objective person would not believe that he or she was free to simply start driving away with Officer Kumlander standing in the roadway. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
This rule has been subject to considerable discussion by California bar members and experts. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Lazar Radic
Apple and Epic both filed a motion for a writ of certiorari before the Supreme Court; with the outcome of the Epic Games v Apple saga now hinging on whether the Court would take up the dispute. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
But Judge Susan Graber, joined by Judge Roopali Desai, concurred separately to “encourage the Supreme Court to take up this question. [read post]