Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Civil Cases"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2022, 12:45 pm
If it’s happening in one place, it may be happening in others,” Robinson told the Texas Lawyer, noting that “hundreds of criminal and civil cases” were affected by Barchak’s racist jury selection process. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:05 pm
In every Jacksonville Criminal Defense Case, the jury is read a series of instructions right before they are sent back to deliberate. [read post]
Does the "clear and convincing evidence" standard of proof for punitive damages make any difference?
13 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
In California and many other U.S. jurisdictions, plaintiffs seeking punitive damages must meet a higher burden of proof than the usual "preponderance of the evidence" standard that applies to civil cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
The need for reasonable restrictions on the limits of Trump’s potential testimony is highlighted by his conduct in the New York civil fraud case last week. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
The Divisional Court had determined that the civil standard of proof should also apply to such cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:10 am
The comparative negligence standard in civil cases is highly favorable to the plaintiff, and Maryland trial lawyers have been fighting to change the standard for years. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:06 am
The two cases were later consolidated. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:06 am
The two cases were later consolidated. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
In Arizona, standard DUI cases have six jurors on the panel. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
South Korea’s experience is instructive. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
The trial court also reminded the jury that the reasonable doubt standard applied to all parts of the trial and re-instructed the jury on the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and reasonable doubt. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:21 pm
The notes to the Pennsylvania standard jury instruction on adverse inference indicate “neither the Supreme Court of the United States nor the Pennsylvania appellate courts have addressed the consequences of a nonparty invoking the Fifth Amendment in a civil case. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:22 pm
The standard is described in Florida Standard Jury Instruction 401.3 GREATER WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE as follows: "Greater weight of the evidence" means the more persuasive and convincing force and effect of the entire evidence in the case. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
A retrial in a civil case is not an everyday occurrence, even for frequent litigants like financial services or insurance companies. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
A retrial in a civil case is not an everyday occurrence, even for frequent litigants like financial services or insurance companies. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:03 pm
If we hold, as the court apparently does, that one implication of the existence of such precise, independent standards is that juries must be instructed to find facts according to those standards, we raise the spectre of requiring trial judges in defamation cases to instruct juries as to four separate and distinct burdens of proof, falling variously on the plaintiff and defendant. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:31 pm
If we hold, as the court apparently does, that one implication of the existence of such precise, independent standards is that juries must be instructed to find facts according to those standards, we raise the spectre of requiring trial judges in defamation cases to instruct juries as to four separate and distinct burdens of proof, falling variously on the plaintiff and defendant. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
The Supreme Court deferred this question because it determined that harm could be shown using the standard for demonstrating harm that is more commonly used in civil cases. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
The Supreme Court deferred this question because it determined that harm could be shown using the standard for demonstrating harm that is more commonly used in civil cases. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:04 am
The Supreme Court deferred this question because it determined that harm could be shown using the standard for demonstrating harm that is more commonly used in civil cases. [read post]
