Search for: "Stanley v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Third Circuit Court of AppealsBerrier v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, No. 11-1395, which is pending a response from the Solicitor General (time to file extended to August 13), and Stanley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:50 am by Philip R. Stein
” Here again, therefore, we see a court finding a principal (here, Morgan Stanley), and its enablers, the credit rating agencies, vulnerable to claims by those misled during the mortgage crisis. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:58 pm by Charles Sartain
v=WsQFhm908T4 Fiduciary Duty  • The Houston court has held that the majority shareholder bears a fiduciary duty in certain circumstances but not in others. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed at length here, both the Ninth Circuit and the California state courts upheld the finding of continuing state court jurisdiction for ’33 Act claims in connection with the Luther v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
As has been the trend, a court has held that despite what may be the superior parenting skills of one parent, that parent may be denied custody if that parent does not promote the relationship of the children with the other parent. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
Superior Court:  Does a court commissioner, acting without the consent of the parties, have authority to summarily deny a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a petition for writ of mandate? [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
 JP Morgan Chase went from A+ to A; Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup were downgraded from A to A-; and Wells Fargo was cut from AA- to A+. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:39 am by Eric Turkewitz
Addendum #2 (8/15/11): Just two weeks after putting up this post, the a Court of Claims judge found for the plaintiff in an attempted suicide case against the State (Acerbo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Court and OSC Review In coming to its conclusion, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice cited the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (BCE) for the proposition that three conditions must be satisfied by a corporation seeking an arrangement: that statutory procedures have been met; that the application has been put forward in good faith; and that the arrangement is fair and reasonable. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Max Factor
Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal.4th 407, 415-416 (2004), citing Foxgate v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:00 am by Cara Horowitz
On Friday afternoon, Judge Goldsmith of the California Superior Court issued his final order in the case pitting environmental justice advocates against the State’s Air Resources Board on the issue of cap and trade (order available here). [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
On May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]