Search for: "Star Insurance Co. v. Federal Insurance Co." Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
Okay, so here’s the next installment of Mandelman’s Monthly Museletter, which I’ve decided I post whenever there are a bunch of things going on that need to be put into proper perspective, but there’s just no way I can write individual articles on each because to do so presents a serious health risk. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm by William McGeveran
Here, at least, the Court found that the records were a necessary component of effective speech by the drug companies, analogizing to the Minnesota tax on paper and ink struck down in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
 In contrast, an offer to pay the foreign officials' "five-star holiday" in an unrelated destination is questionable. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
DVD Format/LOGO Licensing Corporation (TTABlog) Why the paperwork is important – District Court E D Michigan judgment in CLT Logistics v River West Brands (Property, intangible) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition to LIFE FOR THE LIVING over LIFE INSURANCE FOR LIVING, rejects genericness and abandonment counterclaims: Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm by Christa Culver
Title: North Star Alaska Housing Corporation v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
The Contract: The contract required COLA to compensate Miracle Star for its performance of alcohol and drug services, except for fees reimbursed by Medi-Cal, medical insurance, or other third party coverage. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:43 am by Michael Geist
  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is contesting the constitutional validity of Canada's private sector privacy legislation (PIPEDA), arguing it oversteps the federal government's jurisdictional power. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Co., 174 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir. 1999)....A few years after Butero was decided, the Supreme Court [decided Aetna Health Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]