Search for: "State v. Currie"
Results 61 - 80
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 4:03 pm
"Joe Shannon was born restless," Mike Cochran wrote in Texas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:23 am
Sneath, (3d Cir., Jan. 7, 2013), the 3rd Circuit rejected an inmate's claim that his 1st Amendment and RLUIPA free exercise rights were infringed when his Qur'an was taken from him during his cell transfer.In Curry v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:25 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:43 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:02 am
Staton's opinion in Principe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
The case, Dada v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:19 am
The Court of Appeals reverses.The case is Curry-Malcolm v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:22 am
McQueen contended that Currie's action for assault is barred by the “Fireman's Rule” as set out by the Court of Appeals in Santangelo v State, 71 NY2d 393. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:56 am
A Colorado court of appeals explained in Coats v DISH Network, LLC that “lawful activity” for purposes of the statute includes both federal and state law. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:22 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dashawn Curry v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:54 am
" Curry v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
In re-reading the DC Circuit's famous recent Second Amendment decision in Parker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:24 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Trinity Lutheran of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:29 am
Companies may boycott Israel to curry favor with Arab states or out of mere anti-Semitism. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]