Search for: "State v. Revelle"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2012, 5:16 pm
By Lee DavisUnited States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:03 pm
In Continental Casualty et al. v United States of America et al, U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:07 pm
Epps v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:52 am
These topics will be evaluated by Joseph V. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
In Champion v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 6:40 am
In Sherrod v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:59 pm
Queensboro Farm Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:51 pm
Cemco Investors, LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:27 am
As I reported on Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:28 am
On Russian state television and in the pro-Kremlin blogosphere, commentators reacted to the attack on Israel with thinly veiled glee, casting it as a revelation of Western weakness and as the start of a war that could sap Western support for Ukraine.... [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:49 pm
Digging deeper, however, reveals that the private sector and state and local municipalities fared better in FY 2022, as the Commission actually secured less monetary relief in total and per capita as compared to the prior year: $342 million for 33,298 employees in FY 2022 v. $350.7 million for 11,067 employees in FY 2021. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:47 pm
[Fults v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Beach v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:12 pm
United States, Nos. 07-5191, 07-5192 2008 WL 2853214 (D.C. [read post]
