Search for: "State, in Interest of Ac" Results 61 - 80 of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2015, 12:34 am
You will never have seen this before: previously, plans have always been for the whole calendar year (even if later amended).(2) There are two Boards, namely Boards 3.4.02 and 3.5.01, where the post of chairman is stated to be vacant. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:20 am by Howard Knopf
However, he urges the Board to refrain from making any ruling that is broader than necessary.He states:43. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm by Howard Knopf
There were at least four items of interest online in the last couple of days:Here's my blog entitled: AC & the Post-Secondary Tariff: “And Then There Were None”? [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:19 pm
In an interesting development, the Chairman of the EBA is also subject to an objection on the basis of apparent lack of partiality in case R 08/13. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:43 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 When I say “ace” national security reporting team, I mean it. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:39 am
  Most later ISO CGL forms contain language stating that the aggregate applies on an annual basis but are silent with respect to whether the same is true of  the "occurrence" limit. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:36 am
The resulting bill reflects the triumph of politics over science, and the triumph of industry influence over the public interest. . . [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:44 pm by Howard Knopf
So, we may see even more of this in the Post-Secondary file.Somebody needs to look out for the public interest in the post-secondary file. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:26 am by Jon L. Gelman
 The complaint stated further that Stancil obtained orders from the compensation court, but ACE failed to comply. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:17 am by Howard Knopf
Katz has offered in this proceeding that would enable the Board to ensure that the public interest is protected. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  The PCC Code until October 2009 stated that “Whenever the public interest is invoked, the PCC will require editors to demonstrate fully how the public interest was served”. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  In analyzing that issue, now squarely before it for the first time, the Court noted that while neither CEQA nor NEPA statutorily defines “mitigation,” later federal and state implementing regulations did define the term. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Howard Knopf
 These include questions about the “Premium” and “Choice” offerings and the state of AC’s licensing negotiations.It is also notable that Mr. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am by Rosalind English
This was rejected as inconsistent with the authorities, and in particular with the principle that there is no “hard-edged or bright-line rule”,  EB (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 41, [2009] 1 AC 1159. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:09 pm by Howard Knopf
The Board has powers that it can exercise to ensure that the public interest is protected here without imposing undue hardship on legitimate objectors. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:20 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
ACS and the Center for American Progress hosted an event earlier this year examining the nation’s growing justice gap and ways to address it. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 12:50 pm by Gene Takagi
[RM states that this average, while probably overstated, shouldn’t influence policy where a large percentage of Legislation should not be so complex. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm by Howard Knopf
This email reveals some of the background leading up to this deal.Among many interesting aspects, this email shows that AUCC decided to try to settle with AC even before the UofT/Western deal was announced on January 30, 2012. [read post]