Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V T. A. D., Appellant" Results 61 - 80 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Washington under Section 2254(d)(1); and (3) whether the lower court misapplied Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
In The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner reports that the court “has finally decided that it won’t review Lenz v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am by Josh Blackman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) On June 25, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in King v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 12-694 (third relist since the record arrived); the Ninth Circuit state-on-top habeas case Chappell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  We’ll see where this case goes, if anywhere.Sixth, also on the appellate front:  We’ve blogged several timesabout the fate of a supersized 8-figure verdict for a plaintiff who wasn’t even hurt all that much in Polett v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
During the hearings to date, Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Rep. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Contrary to his usual pattern of walking 14 to 20 hours a day in his cell…, he didn't walk much at all. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:54 am by Rory Little
The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v. [read post]