Search for: "State of Alabama v. B. T. D.; B. T. D. v. State of Alabama" Results 61 - 80 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
State, supra.The court goes on to explain that [d]etectives at the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (`IMPD') analyzed D.K.'s cell phone messages and Facebook account. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
A further seven states unhelpfully said their answers cannot be relied upon as guidance by taxpayers (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Mexico). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
Alabama applies retroactively to cases that were already final when Miller was decided, continue. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 14-8189, and Lockhart v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Other relists didn’t fare so well. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm by cdw
Ex parte State of Alabama; (In re: Thomas Robert Lane v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Accord University of South Alabama v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Supp. 3d 1 (D.N.J. 2019), rev’d, 961 F.3d 234 (3d Cir. 2020), cert. denied, — U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Didn’t find anything in Arkansas.CaliforniaIf we didn't find anything here, we'd probably have given up, but most populous state in the nation came through. [read post]