Search for: "State of Alabama v. B. T. D.; B. T. D. v. State of Alabama"
Results 61 - 80
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
B. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am
” Bill Hutchinson and Ella Torres report at ABC News that “[t]he controversial execution of Nathaniel Woods was carried out late Thursday in Alabama just minutes after the Supreme Court denied a temporary stay, issued only hours earlier. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
I guess you’d have to say that that’s okay, right? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:55 pm
See State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
(b) Tax on interest and dividend income only. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
A lifealert recording of the shooting captured petitioner saying “Oh s**t! [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Robert V. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 11:56 am
B. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Blurred Lines: Government Involvement in Corporate Internal Investigations and Implications for Individual Accountability Posted by Andrew Bauer, Jonathan Green, and Sara D’Amico, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, June 7, 2019 Tags: Banks, Deutsche Bank, DOJ, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, LIBOR, Securities enforcement, U.S. federal courts Board Development and Director Succession Planning in the Age of… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[[t]he order marked an abrupt shift for the court, which last month voted 5-4 to let Alabama execute a Muslim man without his imam. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
” "[B]eginning with New York Times, the Court “federalized major aspects of libel law . . . . [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:01 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes suggests that the orders in the abortion case and in a 5-4 decision to allow the execution of a Muslim inmate in Alabama who had challenged the state’s refusal to allow an imam to be present at his execution “provided new insight into the alliances on the reconstituted Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Ann. tit. 22 § 1089(D)(8)(b), and the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ application of the statute in this case deny the petitioner an adequate corrective process for the hearing and determination of his newly available federal constitutional claim in violation of his rights under the 14th Amendment’s due process and equal protection clauses. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
§ 3731(b)(2) in a suit in which the United States has declined to intervene and, if so, whether the relator constitutes an “official of the United States” for purposes of Section 3731(b)(2). [read post]
