Search for: "State of Alabama v. C. B. D." Results 61 - 80 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
The dust continues to settle from Wednesday’s argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But if a state wants to ban viewpoint discrimination by platforms, § 230(c)(2) does not preempt that choice. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  How Will the Interrelatedness Issue Continue to Affect D&O Claims? [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Alabama:  Alabama Divorce & Family Law Attorney Blog by Steven D. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Accord University of South Alabama v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
An organization has “associational” standing to bring claims on behalf of its members if “(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state shall impose any tax on interstate commerce unless that tax (a) has substantial nexus with the taxing state, a sufficient and clear connection between a state and a potential taxpayer; and (b) is nondiscriminatory between in-state activity and out-of-state activity; and (c) is fairly apportioned, designed to tax [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm by Rick Hasen
”89 The court confirmed this understanding of the section 4(a) bailout provision by citing to the Supreme Court’s City of Rome case, in which the Court held that the city of Rome, Georgia, “was ineligible to seek bailout because the coverage formula of § 4(b) ha[d] never been applied to it. [read post]