Search for: "State of Connecticut v. U.S. Merit System" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
– Steve Limitiaco, Pacific Daily News, March 31, 2010 The Guam Waterworks Authority, which is years behind on court-ordered improvements to the island’s water and wastewater systems, plans to negotiate a new settlement agreement with the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
Introduction In most states throughout the U.S., consumers visiting a supermarket would not pay state sales taxes on their bacon and eggs for the week, but often would pay sales tax on a ready-made rotisserie chicken. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Agency for International Development, which dealt with a virtually identical claim, Sotomayor’s opinion rejected the group’s First Amendment claim on the merits. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Each participant and beneficiary who will receive documents under the new electronic disclosure regime must be notified in writing (i.e., on paper) that the new system will be used and they must be allowed to opt out of electronic distribution at any time. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Target stated on December 19, 2013, that approximately 40 million credit- and debit-card accounts “may have been impacted” after being used to pay for purchases at its U.S. stores between November 27 and December 15. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Three of these statesConnecticut, New York, and Wyoming—impose taxes mirroring the old Ohio corporate franchise tax, under which businesses pay the greater of net worth or net income liability.[12] Beginning in 2006, Ohio CFT liability declined in increments of 20 percent a year, with firms responsible for 80 percent of their standard liability that year, 60 percent in 2007, and so on until 2010, when the tax was eliminated. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
  California and Arkansas, for example, bar hikes in the wake of a declaration of an emergency that exceed a certain percentage-point increase over the pre-emergency price level.[11]   Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Connecticut bar any price increase beyond that required by the higher costs of post-disaster economic activity.[12]   While these standards may not initially appeal to merchants in that they restrict prices, the standards are… [read post]