Search for: "State of New York et al v. United States Department of Justice et al" Results 61 - 80 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Government is not a party to this defamation lawsuit—Victor Restis et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
United States and Black, et al. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:15 pm by admin
Recently the United States Department of Justice intervened in a whistleblower complaint filed in the Southern District of New York involving Continuum Health Partners in United States ex. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Michele M. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am by WIMS
City of New York, New York, et al - Apr 21: In the U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming… [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144… [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]