Search for: "State v David Moree"
Results 61 - 80
of 9,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm
David Cole and Peter Margulies both have more to say on the Tarek Mehanna case. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
David E Bernstein, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, has posted Reflections on the 100th Anniversary of Buchanan v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:58 pm
Last week, we wrote briefly about EMC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
More on the 1986 Supreme Court case, McCleskey v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
On April 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of David Antoon et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:24 am
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:24 am
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm
There has been much discussion in the news, blogosphere, and general ruminations about the Supreme Court's January opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
On June 16, 2020, the First Circuit released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
The claimant stated that this did not happen. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:49 am
David H. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
But perhaps more importantly, Justice O’Connor’s abandonment (apparently with Justice Kennedy’s encouragement) of ISL shows us there was never a majority of Justices at the time of B v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present… [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:58 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:49 pm
See David Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
Media law academic Dr David Rolph reflects on two significant cases. [read post]
31 May 2009, 5:59 pm
Theodore Olsen and David Boies -- the prominent opposing lawyers in Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm
More than any other decision, Queen v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
One recent example is Romer v. [read post]