Search for: "State v David Moree" Results 61 - 80 of 9,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm by Benjamin Wittes
David Cole and Peter Margulies both have more to say on the Tarek Mehanna case. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
David E Bernstein, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, has posted Reflections on the 100th Anniversary of Buchanan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:19 am by Steve Hall
  More on the 1986 Supreme Court case, McCleskey v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm by Shima Baradaran
There has been much discussion in the news, blogosphere, and general ruminations about the Supreme Court's January opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But perhaps more importantly, Justice O’Connor’s abandonment (apparently with Justice Kennedy’s encouragement) of ISL shows us there was never a majority of Justices at the time of B v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present… [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am by INFORRM
Media law academic Dr David Rolph reflects on two significant cases. [read post]