Search for: "State v Duarte"
Results 61 - 69
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE WATER QUALITY City of Duarte v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
The threat posed by the latter is unique because “when equipped with sophisticated surveillance technologies, the state may be tempted to embark on forward-looking, ‘fishing expedition[s] in the hope of uncovering evidence of crime. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
However, a rapidly changing social context and the emergence of cases such as Duarte Agostinho (2020) have forced a discussion on whether phenomena such as eco-anxiety can amount to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment within Article 3 ECHR. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY City of Duarte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
